|
| The University of Western Ontario |
|
Our MissionThe McIntosh Gallery is a centre for the presentation and dissemination of advanced practices and research in the fields of art history and contemporary visual art. The McIntosh serves the students, faculty and staff of The University of Western Ontario and the broader community of the City of London as a teaching and research resource. Ongoing programs and services actively promote innovative projects in the production, exhibition, interpretation and collection of visual culture. Our VisionTo be nationally recognized as a leader among university-based public art galleries for creative interpretation and scholarly research in art and visual culture. McINTOSH GALLERY RESOURCE CENTRE Did you know the McIntosh Gallery has resources for you to use?Our Recourse Centre is located on the lower level of the gallery. We have many reference books on art history, art theory, museology, dictionaries and exhibition catalogues. The McIntosh Resource Centre materials are for reference only. You may drop in Monday to Friday, 9:15am to 5:00pm or call/email ahead to be sure. McIntosh Gallery
Strategic Plan
|
|
External Review Recommendation |
Strategic Directions |
|
Strategic Directions Task and equip the McIntosh Gallery to develop a formal five-year strategic plan for the organization, whose process embraces the widest possible high-level campus and community representation. Several funding sources support art gallery strategic planning, such as the Ontario Arts Council Compass Programme and the Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Programme. |
Yes |
| Ensure that the recommendations and objectives of the McIntosh Gallery strategic plan are consistent with the emerging objectives of the new UWO strategic plan; that they are formally endorsed and adequately broadcast by the university; that they are benchmarked for mutual accountability; and that strategies for adequate human and financial resources are identified to achieve the elements of the plan. |
Yes |
| Achieve broader representation on the McIntosh Gallery committee by adding a (preferably graduate) student, a member of the University's Advancement staff, and by replacing one of the current University members with a community member - either an art collector or a senior artist. |
Yes |
| Increase
the Artshare loan fees and reduce the number of works loaned out in
order to better safeguard the works and increase revenue. |
Addressed yet in a different manner than this specific recommendation |
| The McIntosh's direct report should be maintained at its current level, but should be changed from Vice-President (External) to Vice-President (Academic). |
Yes |
|
Collections and Programs Develop more
dedicated funds for acquisitions and foster the idea of donations
to |
Agree in principle, yet not dominant priority in short term. |
| Review the efficacy of the lending programme in relationship to the strategic direction and goals of the McIntosh Gallery. At the very least, increase the rental fees for services to bring them more in line with actual costs. |
Yes |
| Re-imagine the presentation of the permanent collection in the McIntosh Gallery and be attentive to how subtle details of presentation can affect the appreciation and understanding of the curatorial thesis. |
Agree in principle
and to be further defined over next five years |
| Suspend further touring programmes until adequate human and financial resources can be dedicated to the programme. |
Yes |
| Re-imagine the temporary exhibition programme by focusing it around the permanent collection to give it cohesiveness and rationale. |
Agree in principle |
| Upgrade the collections management database so that all collections-related information management can be effected within this environment. The Canadian Heritage Information Network can be of great assistance to the McIntosh in selecting and implementing the software. |
Yes |
| Dedicate a full-time staff person to the position of Registrar/Collections Manager. |
Yes |
| As part of a new facility, build adequate and museologically appropriate collection storage, preparation, study areas, offices and staging areas for the physical management of the collections. |
No. Longer
term vision. Priority is collection storage issue. |
| The noise generated by the HVAC system in the art storage area is extremely high and should be tested to ensure a safe working environment for the Registrar/Installations Officer. |
No. It was
tested in 2005 and is safe. |
| Develop
an education department at the McIntosh Gallery and fund the full-time
position of Educator. Foster improved relationships between the McIntosh Gallery and the Visual Arts Department. Evaluate the
staff time and resources devoted to community education and consider
if these are proper and proportionate. |
Yes. Could
be achieved by the realignment of responsibilities Yes. Rebalancing of where time spent is integral to achieving strategic directions.
|
|
Change the McIntosh's reporting structure from Vice-President (Academic) to the Vice-President (External). Continue to lend works of art from the permanent collection as appropriate. Significantly enhance exhibition and programmatic activity, including collaborations that lead to new research that is reviewed and published in recognized scholarly formats. Ensure that resources are in place to allow the McIntosh to join the Canadian Heritage Information Network database. |
Yes
Yes. Major priority.
|
|
Internal and External Relations As part of the strategic planning of both the university and the McIntosh, the current reporting structure should be reconsidered and properly aligned with the shared strategic objectives and goals of both entities. As noted elsewhere, the review committee recommends the VICE PRESIDENT Academic as the optimal reporting link. Ensure that prime objectives of strategic planning include structures, goals and support that favour formal and informal ties between the McIntosh and key campus stakeholders (e.g. Visual Arts, History) and with the broader academic community, and identify the McIntosh's intellectual and research direction. Recognize that to nourish the academic environment, individuals must themselves be nourished, and therefore create professional development opportunities for McIntosh staff consistent with those provided for other professionals on campus through funding and time-away options Review the McIntosh's current role in the London cultural community and establish a framework for the level and type of interface between them that more appropriately reflects the McIntosh's role as a university art gallery within the broader community. |
|
|
Define and support structural and programmatic links among the main regional "cultural players" both on and off campus. McIntosh Gallery should be provided with resources to undertake a communications audit, in concert with the VICE PRESIDENT External's office, to create a higher profile both on and off campus |
Yes
|
|
UWO should improve its representation of the McIntosh Gallery as a campus asset in its own marketing tools. McIntosh Gallery should negotiate a contract with an appropriate distributor and/or with sister galleries to disseminate its publications |
Yes
|
|
Operations Create and staff at least two full-time positions of Registrar and Educator, and consider further staffing based on the goals of a strategic plan. Consider developing adjunct and cross-appointment positions to enhance the gallery's staffing and human resources needs. The facility needs to be reconceived and a properly appointed building needs to be built to house the collections, programmes and aspirations of the McIntosh Gallery. The facility must flow from a well-thought, considered and creative analysis of the McIntosh's strategic goals and as a full partner in the scheme of the university intellectual mission. The facility should enhance the generation of knowledge through the use and study of collections, the presentation of exhibitions, the production of artist projects, and the creative collaboration of scholars, curators and artists. |
Longer term
initiative.
|
|
Finance, Fundraising, and Budgets The University
assumes the full cost of the salaries of the Gallery's 3.5 permanent
staff members. The University
repays immediately the $180,000 (plus interest) it owes to the William
H. Abbott Fund, in order to build and safeguard the University's
art collection now and in the future. |
Yes
|
McIntosh Gallery Strategic Planning
Exercise
Terms of Reference
Revised March 16, 2007
The July, 2006 McIntosh Gallery Formal External Review considered and
assessed the situation of the McIntosh Gallery over the last four years
and to some degree advised on what should be taken into account in future
planning.
This was a two day process that was a 'sounding' that now requires greater
in-depth analysis of assumptions and research upon which to base future
considerations.
The McIntosh Gallery Committee of the Board, in concert with the V.P.
(External), Ted Garrard, will convene a Strategic Planning Committee composed
of eight to ten stakeholder representatives, (two or three from the academic
community including one from the Visual Arts Department; one or two members
of the McIntosh Gallery Committee; a donor or a volunteer from the external
community; a student representative from the Board of Governors; an external
representative from the City or another educational institution), to steward
the process and oversee the work of an external facilitator.
Reporting to the McIntosh Gallery Committee of the Board of Governors
and to the V.P. (External), the Strategic Planning Committee shall consider
the following as a framework for drafting their Terms of Reference:
I. Vision, Mission and Mandate
What are the future possibilities (vision), the mission, mandate and the
role of the McIntosh Gallery as a public art gallery situated at The University
of Western Ontario?
What is the context for the McIntosh Gallery in terms of the University
Strategic Plan?
What is the context for the McIntosh Gallery in terms of the External
Strategic Plan?
How might these inform the future mission and mandate of the McIntosh
Gallery?
II. Governance and Management
In light of the mission and mandate of the McIntosh Gallery, what might
the appropriate governance structure be for the McIntosh Gallery in terms
of the following?
a) Considerations given its status as a public art gallery
b) Current positioning within the V.P. (External) portfolio
c) Status of the McIntosh Gallery Committee as a standing committee of
the Board of Governors of The University of Western Ontario
d) Internal functions: is the management structure of the Gallery appropriate
and are management functions effective?
III. Internal and External Relationships
What are the expectations and the consequences of internal and external
relations within the University and with other organizations?
What should the McIntosh Gallery's relationship be with other academic
and administrative units within the University?
What should the McIntosh Gallery's relationship be with other external
cultural institutions and groups in the City of London, the Province,
the Country and internationally?
IV. Programming/Collection
What kinds of programming should the McIntosh Gallery undertake?
What is the role of the Collection and how should it be resourced?
What are the expectations and the consequences?
How should the Collection be accessed, including considerations of exhibitions,
Artshare, research and loans?
V. Resources
What are the appropriate physical, human and financial resources needed
to support the McIntosh Gallery?
How might the McIntosh Gallery vision fit into the campus master plan?
What might the appropriate balance be between operating funding, external
funding and endowment funds?
What consideration should be given the maintenance of the existing spaces
dedicated to the McIntosh Gallery and the future space needs or possible
expansion?
What consideration is required for succession planning?
VI. Timetable
December 2006: McIntosh Gallery Committee approve Strategic Planning Committee
composition and Draft Terms of Reference;
January - February 2007: work with Ted Garrard to recruit Strategic Planning
Committee members and Chair; hire a consultant/facilitator; share terms
of reference with potential stakeholders to be involved in the process,
interviewees, or invited reports
February - May 2007: information gathering/research; consultation process,
public soundings/interviews/written submissions
May - August 2007: report writing
September 2007: review of draft written report/recommendations by McIntosh
Gallery Committee and Strategic Planning Committee
October 15, 2007: final report deadline
November 2007: report public release and feedback; implementation priorities
and schedule
McIntosh Gallery Strategic Plan
Summary of Stakeholder Input
June 15, 2007
Consultation Process Overview
Three consultation sessions were conducted on May 14, 15 and 31, 2007.
They included representation from the University, the community and the
general public. Invitations were extended to key stakeholders from the
internal campus and external community. Additionally, notices were placed
in the Western News and London Free Press with an open call for public
presentations.
The following is a high level summary of key themes that emerged from
the stakeholder consultations and written submissions.
Context
"The context of the McIntosh in the University's Strategic Plan
as well as its physical location on Western's campus will allow it to
include itself as the creative heart of the 'best student experience'
- to act as a conduit for student growth beyond the classroom, and as
a conduit for a better understanding of the social and cultural aspects
of the city and the region for those students, faculty and staff coming
to Western from across Canada and beyond."
Western's new strategic plan outlines its mission as providing the best
student experience at a research-intensive university. The current function
and potential of the McIntosh Gallery to enhance Western's progress in
advancing this mission is outlined by the recommendations of the various
stakeholders consulted over the past few weeks. Indeed, the McIntosh is
viewed as forming part of the intellectual environment of Western by encouraging
visual literacy and critical thinking. As such, the McIntosh is foundational
to the university, as it is a centre for inquiry and discovery, which
extends out into the community and brings the community to Western. Through
its vast collection, much of which is displayed across campus and through
its public art installations, the McIntosh helps foster an appreciation
for the visual arts. Indeed, the University itself is a Gallery by virtue
of the McIntosh collection and its programs.
There is a concern however, among stakeholders that the
McIntosh has yet to fully maximize its role in supporting the academic
mission of the University or the best student experience in a research
intensive environment. As such, this strategic planning process has been
welcomed and provides the impetus for the revitalization of the Gallery
and the contribution it makes to the life of the University and the broader
London community.
I: Vision/Mission/Mandate
The mission and vision of both Western and the McIntosh Gallery are perceived
to mesh well. Participants of the consultations felt that the McIntosh
Gallery should be aligned strongly with the University's strategic plan
and work to achieve its mission.
- There is the belief that McIntosh contributes to Western's mandate to
provide the best student experience at a research intensive university,
though the Gallery's role in doing so is not fully understood or appreciated
by the greater Western community.
o The McIntosh Gallery is not well known to the vast majority of Western
students. Much can be done to better engage students in the work of the
McIntosh, and contribute to their volunteer, professional and personal
development.
- McIntosh has the potential to play a significant academic
role at Western , however, many respondents felt that this aspect of the
McIntosh's mandate was not being fulfilled, in part because a lack of
resources and in part because of the Gallery's focus on the external community.
o Over 3,200 works in the collection constitute a significant resource
(yet untapped) for students, faculty and visiting researchers.
o The Gallery could also provide educational opportunities for the campus
and London communities. For instance, increased programming for elementary
and secondary school students was suggested as well as workshops such
as "Art Appreciation for Beginners" or "Introduction to
Drawing."
II: Governance and Management
The majority of participants had no strong views on the issue of governance.
Given the Gallery's strong community focus, many believed the Gallery
was well situated in the Vice President (External) portfolio. If the Gallery
embraced a stronger academic focus, it was felt the Gallery would benefit
from being under the umbrella of Vice President (Academic) or the Faculty
of Arts and Humanities.
Governance
- Perception that the current McIntosh Gallery Committee of the Board
of Governors is effective, however committee members should be selected
to reflect the different interests with which the gallery is supposed
to engage. Those consulted would like to see:
o Broader representation in general with people who have a deeper interest
in the future operations of the Gallery.
o A broad range of faculty representatives to reinforce the linkages with
research.
o Some respondents recommend greater student representation in the governance
of the McIntosh.
Management
- Several concerns were raised regarding staff resources and succession
planning.
o Current staff has been noted as effective; however, participants believe
that the gallery is in a position of crisis and/or opportunity: impending
retirement of long-term staff could destabilize gallery operations.
- Noted that additional staff is required to properly manage gallery programs
and operations.
o Need at least 1-2 more full time staff, especially if mandate is to
expand or grow scope of McIntosh Gallery
III: Internal/External Relations
"A university art gallery is an extension of the confident, lofty
mission of a university; augmenting the spirit of curiosity, learning
and investigation for its students and faculty, as well as standing as
an authoritative and influential beacon to the wider community"
The majority of the consultation responses focus on this issue. It seems
vital that the McIntosh Gallery improve both internal and external relations.
It is suggested that some of this is related to programming while some
of it is related to marketing, public relations and visibility.
Internal
"Everyone on campus encounters the McIntosh Gallery on a daily
basis whether they know it or not."
- The McIntosh should be featured in recruitment and orientation materials
and programming for staff/student/faculty to demonstrate Western's commitment
to excellence, diversity, and innovation. The general belief exists that
there is a place for a public art gallery in a University environment
and that its primary function is to contribute to inquiry and discovery
of visual culture in its many forms.
- Respondents felt that the gallery is not confined to a physical building,
but rather extends across the campus - through both public art displays
and the Art Share program. However, attention needs to be called to these
features i.e. labeling of collections on display as part of MG collection.
Participants would like to see:
o Increased signage on campus and at the University gates of the Gallery
building location
o Increased and consistent recognition of the contributions of the Gallery
to the visual culture of the Western campus.
o Increased awareness of the Gallery as an academic resource for students,
faculty, staff and researchers.
o Enhanced utilization of the web and other technologies to make the Gallery
accessible and known
o Greater integration of the McIntosh and the University brands so as
to foster understanding that the McIntosh is indeed part of the University
community.
- Signage, public relations, and virtual connections are encouraged to
reach the internal audience.
External
- The McIntosh is one of Western's principal assets in terms of community
interaction, and this link derives from the duality of its constituency."
- Participants would like to see the gallery space re-imagined
for new and nontraditional uses in order to attract broad new audiences.
o Links to innovative exhibitions and programming
o Enhanced ability to display new & emerging visual mediums
- Should play a role in the greater regional community.
McIntosh is perceived as one of Western's principal assets in terms of
community interaction.
- The location of the gallery on the campus presents
a challenge for creating visibility on and off campus. Enhanced and innovative
signage was suggested in order to remedy these blind spots.
o Use the old BMO building on Richmond Street for McIntosh Gallery - better
ease of access for the public, higher profile location & proximity
to University gates.
- Now, in particular, is an opportune moment to take advantage of London's current reinvestment in arts and culture via the 'Creative Cities Initiative.'
IV: Programming/Collection
"As a heritage building in the heart of campus, the Gallery lends
itself centrally to the physical, social and cultural activities and education
of the campus and beyond - it needs to be maintained as part of the 'memory'
of the history of campus and university as well as the 'history' of art
within the region - in this way it is ongoing and not static, as the region,
the university and the campus continues to grow and change."
The limitations of the resources available to the McIntosh in terms of
both space and capital were often cited as the culprit in the deficiencies
in programming and the collection.
Collection
"The McIntosh gallery's collection constitutes, in effect, a research
database of Canadian cultural history."
Participants noted:
- Access to and storage of the collection is the biggest barrier to the
McIntosh living up to its potential as a considerable amenity at a research
intensive University.
- Many concerns were raised regarding the inadequate capacity for proper
storage of the collection.
- Preservation of the current collection is being compromised because
of a lack of resources
- The collection as an asset enhancing the 'student experience' needs
to be highlighted and further explored
- Now dependent on gifts, the acquisitions do not reflect
the aims of the McIntosh.
o Increased resources are required in order for the McIntosh to build
a collection that furthers Western's mission.
o Collections strategy needs to be better linked to the academic mission
and support curriculum directions wherever possible
o First decide on the role of visual literacy and culture that Western
wants to be known for, then determine a revised collection policy
- The re-focusing of the London Regional Art and Historical Museum collections
could also result in duplication and overlap with the McIntosh Gallery
as both look to concentrate their effort on regional art
Programming
- The job of a public gallery and a campus university gallery is to be
vigilant by presenting contemporary ideas, progressive thinking, and often
relevant historical references either by specific directed exhibitions
or by tertiary association."
- It was noted that the current programming was deeply tied to the interests
and expertise of the staff. Respondents believe that the programming should
work to enhance the mission of both the Gallery and the University.
o The Gallery needs to clearly identify its target audiences and develop
focused programs in order to reach them.
o Current Gallery programming is often incompatible with the academic
priorities/curriculum of the Department of Visual Arts and hence seen
as having marginal benefit to its faculty and students.
- Collaboration with internal and external groups was encouraged as a
way to develop more timely and responsive programming.
- Programming outside of the traditional parameters of the Gallery was
also suggested as a way to increase the profile of the McIntosh and create
new interest.
- Art Share, in particular, was singled out as a successful program that
enhances the visual culture and climate of intellectual engagement at
Western.
o More must be done to boost the profile of this program and its association
to the Gallery if it is to remain a signature programming feature.
- Use the gallery to host other cultural programming
or on campus events to increase its profile as THE centre of visual culture
- once people come in the doors they are more likely to return
- One participant suggested the programming goal should be to "Pair
initiatives to support innovation, cultural diversity and scholarly research."
o Many calls for increased cross disciplinary programming and research
in which the McIntosh plays a significant role of facilitation and linking
V: Resources
"Whether the McIntosh Gallery's collection is viewed as a financial
investment or cultural one (it is in fact both). The value of that investment
is jeopardized if irreplaceable works of art are permitted to degrade."
The resource deficiencies at the McIntosh encompass capital, infrastructure
and human resources.
- It was suggested that while updated and upgraded facilities were necessary
to effectively support the collection and programming, this should only
be considered once the Gallery's position and future in the University
is determined.
o Space for programming, more storage space, and wheelchair accessibility
were highlighted as the three most important space needs.
- Similarly, if the Gallery's role as a key asset in the University is
affirmed, it is reasonable to suggest that greater operating support should
come from the University with an increase in support from the current
40% to 60 or 75% of core operating funds of the Gallery.
o The McIntosh should also be more proactive in fundraising through the
development of a case for support, annual and long-term fundraising priorities
and by utilizing the resources of the central Development Office more
effectively. Indeed, it was felt that the valuable human resources of
the Gallery should not be spent on minor fundraising campaigns and fundraising
events.
o Subsisting largely on provincial and federal grants, the McIntosh is
subject to significant variations and pressures on its annual operating
budget. This impacts the ability for long term planning. These grants
in turn have decreased steadily over the last decade.
- It was suggested that the McIntosh prioritize human
and capital resources in order to reflect their goals.
o Again, increased staff was suggested for a variety of purposes including:
public relations, digitizing and archiving, programming and academic linkages,
and collection management.
Noted Positives
Consistently, the following areas were pointed out as strengths of
the current McIntosh Gallery
- McIntosh is able to display 35% of its collection while typical university
Galleries are able to display 5% at one time.
- Staff knowledge, expertise, service orientation, outreach, and collaborative
efforts in the local arts community
- Over the past two decades the collection has increased in size and depth
to become an exceptional research database on Canadian visual history
and culture.
- Oldest university art gallery in Canada
- Value of collection is $11 million and value of confirmed planned gift
expectancies is $2.4 million
"The Gallery has established a provincial, national and international reputation for innovative programming, an outstanding collection of Canadian and international art, and the mentoring of artists, colleagues and students."
Contributors to the Stakeholder Input Sessions
Submissions were received from 25 stakeholders either through a written submission or presentation to the Strategic Planning Committee. The stakeholder input sessions were held May 14, 15 & 31, 2007.
Stakeholder Presenters
Alison Ariss*, - Consultant - Research Western
Ben Benedict*, - Critic/Writer - The Londoner, Curator Gay Pride Art Show
David Bobier*, - Executive Director, Curator of the Art Gallery of St.
Thomas
Professor Graham Broad*, - King's College
Judy Bryant, - City Councilor and Artist
Alan & Phyllis Cohen, - Collectors, Volunteers & Donors
Jan Cook, - former student in fine arts
Dr. Ted Hewitt, - Vice-President (Research) - UWO
Dr. Dalin Jameson*, - Executive Assistant to the President & Policy
Planning Officer, UWO
Derek Liddington, - MFA Graduate Student, UWO
Dr. Fred Longstaffe, - Provost - UWO
Steve Lyons, - BFA Student, Visual Arts Student, UWO
Patrick L. Mahon, - Chair, Department of Visual Arts, UWO
David Merritt, - Associate Professor, Visual Arts, UWO
Tony McAulay, - Professor, Fanshawe College
Joe Schneider, - Volunteer at McIntosh Gallery
Maurice Stubbs, - Funding Director of McIntosh Gallery & Artist
Victoria Stasiuk, - Financial Planner, Former Co-Ordinator of Forest City
Gallery
Guy Spiron, - Community member
Randy Timmins, The Marketing Department (observed Public Input session)
Gerald Vaandering*, - Artist
Kadie Ward, - UWO Alumnus (Philosophy), member of Emerging Leaders Committee
& Entrepreneur
Written Submissions
Robin Keirstead, - University Archivist
Linda Paulocik, - Former Director/Curator of The Station Gallery, Whitby
ON; currently an Independent Curator
Arch Sturaitis
* Presenters who also provided a written submission
Greg Curnoe Public Art Endowment
HISTORY:
Proceeds from the 2001 Open Air: Bikes, Benches, Canoes & Beyond, London's first public art festival, have created the Greg Curnoe Public Art Endowment with the London Community Foundation. The project and auction, resulted in $12,085.39 to establish this new fund in support of future public art initiatives.
Open Air II: Gardens & Gateways, added $2,500 to the endowment through a ticketed tour of private gardens.
This endowment enables the community to recognize and commemorate the incalculable contribution of Greg Curnoe to art in the public domain for everyone here in London. We can all look forward to future public art projects in our fair city, supported by the earnings from this fund. Donations are welcome any time
Additional gifts to the fund on an ongoing basis are encouraged and welcomed.
The London Arts Council is agreeable to administering grants from the fund to the community as a special additional public art initiatives component of the new Allocations Committee process that distributed some $200,000. on behalf of the City of London for the first time last year.